The impact of extranodal spread on overall and recurrence-free survival in patients with clinically early-stage cervical cancer, but with tumor positive pelvic lymph nodes after radical hysterectomy
van der Ven, R. G. F. M.; Wenzel, H. H.; van der Aa, M. A.; Mom, C. H.; Thuijs, N. B.; van der Velden, J.
Show abstract
Objective Extranodal spread is an adverse prognostic factor in several cancers. In clinically early-stage cervical cancer and positive lymph nodes after radical hysterectomy, extranodal spread is routinely registered in pathology reports, but it does not influence adjuvant treatment decisions. This nationwide study assessed the prognostic value of extranodal spread. Methods Patients diagnosed between 2009 and 2024 with clinical early-stage cervical cancer (TNM T1 to T2a2) and pathologically positive regional lymph nodes after radical hysterectomy were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Cox proportional-hazard models assessed differences in overall survival and recurrence-free survival. A Bayesian Cox model with informative prior was applied to complement overall survival analysis. Recurrence patterns were compared by extranodal spread status. Results Among 408 patients, 46 (11.3%) had extranodal spread. In multivariable frequentist analysis, extranodal spread was significantly associated with poorer recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-3.49), but not with overall survival (HR 1.37, CI 0.78-2.41). Bayesian analysis showed a significant difference in overall survival (HR 1.63, CI 1.14-2.27). Among patients with recurrence, the distribution of locoregional and distant recurrence patterns did not significantly differ between those with and without extranodal spread (p=0.09). Conclusion Extranodal spread is associated with poorer recurrence-free survival in clinically early-stage cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy. For overall survival, results were directionally consistent but dependent on the analytical approach, likely reflecting limited statistical power. These findings suggest a role for extranodal spread in risk stratification and follow-up, warranting further investigation before informing treatment decisions.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cumulative COVID-19 incidence, mortality, and prognosis in cancer survivors: a population-based study in Reggio Emilia, Northern Italy 91%
- Cost-effectiveness of risk-stratified screening for cervical cancer in cohorts vaccinated against human papillomavirus with moderate vaccination coverage 91%
- Prediction of Colorectal Cancer Risk Based on Profiling with Common Genetic Variants 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinct temporal trends in breast cancer incidence from 1997 to 2016 by molecular subtypes: A population-based study of Scottish cancer registry data 92%
- HPV self-sampling among long-term non-attenders to cervical cancer screening in Norway: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial 92%
- Inequalities in the decline and recovery of pathological cancer diagnoses during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in pN1 Breast Cancer: Survival Outcomes and Prognostic Factors From a Single-Institution Cohort 92%
- Prognostic value of the Residual Cancer Burden index according to breast cancer subtype: validation on a cohort of BC patients treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 92%
- Survival benefit of adjuvant therapy following neoadjuvant therapy in patients with resected esophageal cancer: a retrospective cohort study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The prognostic value of lymph node involvement after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is different among breast cancer subtypes 92%
- Distinct genomic profiles are associated with treatment response and survival in ovarian cancer 91%
- Impact of BRCA mutation status on tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), response to treatment, and prognosis in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-cancer genome-wide association study of endometrial cancer and epithelial ovarian cancer identifies genetic risk regions associated with risk of both cancers 91%
- Incorporating alternative Polygenic Risk Scores into the BOADICEA breast cancer risk prediction model 90%
- PCSK9 and breast cancer survival: a Mendelian Randomization study 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.