Artificial Intelligence and Mobile Health Technologies for Improved Healthcare Access: Design and Pilot Evaluation of an Integrated Digital Health Platform for a Nigerian Teaching Hospital
Ochem, O. E.; Ezego, O. P.
Show abstract
Healthcare access barriers among Nigerian university students remain under-researched, particularly regarding localized digital health interventions. This study designed, developed, and evaluated a mobile health platform integrating AI-assisted triage, teleconsultation, appointment scheduling, and records management for students at the University of Abuja Teaching Hospital (UATH). A single-group pre-post design was conducted with 50 enrolled student-patients, with each participant observed for 30 days. The platform's triage feature utilized MedGemma, deployed locally via Ollama on UATH infrastructure using a multi-turn conversational architecture. Evaluation metrics included a survey operationalizing the Penchansky and Thomas access framework, the System Usability Scale (SUS), and triage validation against two independent clinicians using weighted Cohen's kappa. Among 61 in-scope triage sessions from 28 participants, mean triage response time was 34.8 seconds with no performance degradation. Among 22 participants completing the SUS, the mean score was 73.2, significantly exceeding the standard 68 benchmark (p = .046). Healthcare access improved directionally across four of five measured dimensions. AI triage classifications demonstrated substantial agreement with independent clinicians (kappa = 0.66-0.72), strengthening in longer conversations. No significant access equity differences were detected between on-campus and off-campus participants in the underpowered pilot subgroup analysis. This study demonstrates the technical feasibility, usability, and clinical concordance of a locally deployed, AI-assisted health platform in a resource-constrained Nigerian setting, providing, to our knowledge, the first evaluation of MedGemma for AI-assisted triage among Nigerian university students and justifying a larger, fully powered follow-up study.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Web-based, Mobile Responsive Application to Screen Healthcare Workers for COVID Symptoms: Descriptive Study 97%
- Is virtual care the new normal? Evidence supporting Covid-19’s durable transformation on healthcare delivery 95%
- Iterative Development of a Mobile Phone Application to Support Community Health Volunteers during Cervical Cancer Screening in Western Kenya 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 94%
- Defining Destigmatizing Design Guidelines for Use in Sexual Health-Related Digital Technologies: A Delphi Study 93%
- Use of Generative AI for Health Among Urban Youth in Pakistan: A Mixed-Methods Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Model of Workflow in the Hospital During a Pandemic to Assist Management 93%
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 93%
- Nurses’ experience of using video consultation in a digital care setting and its impact on their workflow and communication 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Learning from the resilience of hospitals and their staff to the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review 92%
- Challenges in Implementing a Mobile AI Chatbot Intervention for Depression Among Youth on Psychiatric Waiting Lists: A Randomized Control Study Termination Report 92%
- The role of IT ambidexterity, digital dynamic capability and knowledge processes as enablers of patient agility: an empirical study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.