Systematic evaluation of structural connectome thresholding in whole-brain network modelling
Qian, L.; Ju, S.; Li, Z.; Xie, Y.; Yue, Q.; Chen, L.
Show abstract
Large-scale whole-brain network models rely on structural connectomes to constrain simulated neural dynamics, yet the optimal processing of these anatomical scaffolds is not fully established. Here, we investigate the impact of structural connectome thresholding on whole-brain model performance to advance precision individual modelling. We measure model goodness-of-fit to both static functional connectivity and dynamic functional connectivity across a comprehensive spectrum of network densities, spatial parcellations, and model complexities using neuroimaging datasets of healthy individuals and a clinical cohort of post-stroke patients. We demonstrate that the optimal structural sparsity is highly resolution dependent. In coarse-grained parcellations, proportional thresholding enhances the model's fit to static functional connectivity but relies on denser connectome to maintain dynamic functional fits. Conversely, fine-grained models require stringent connectome thresholding which simultaneously optimizes both static and dynamic functional fits. Taken together, these results indicate that the uncritical use of raw structural connectomes introduces suboptimal dynamical regimes, establishing resolution-tailored thresholding as an indispensable step for constructing precision brain network models.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- On the edge of criticality: strength-dependent perturbation unveils delicate balance between fluctuation and oscillation in brain dynamics 95%
- Stability of spontaneous, correlated activity in mouse auditory cortex 94%
- Cholinergic modulation supports dynamic switching of resting state networks through selective DMN suppression 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.