Integrating learning in movement using step-selection analyses
Catitti, B.; Fieberg, J.; Gruebler, M. U.
Show abstract
1. Understanding how animals acquire and use information from the environment is critical for linking movement to population dynamics, species distributions and conservation. Advances in tracking technologies and growing interest in learning processes have opened opportunities to study behaviours such as habitat exploration in translocated animals or ontogeny of migration and dispersal movements. However, accessible statistical methods for studying these behavioural processes are lacking. 2. We present a learning-explicit step-selection analysis (SSA) that integrates movement, habitat selection, and learning into a single evolving process. At the start of the movement trajectory, the animal is assumed to have no knowledge of the landscape, i.e. its internal habitat quality map is initialized to a constant. As the animal moves, this map is updated dynamically: with each step, only the habitat within its perceptual range becomes known and contributes to future decisions. 3. Through simulations, we show that this method separates true habitat preferences from learning effects and reveals when large-scale behaviours, such as attraction to resources or avoidance of risks, emerge as knowledge accumulates. Critically, we demonstrate that ignoring learning, as in traditional SSA, can lead to biased estimators of habitat selection. 4. Finally, we apply our approach to a real-world GPS dataset of naive individuals, consisting of 10 juvenile red kites dispersing in Switzerland. Using leave-one-individual-out cross-validation, we show that learner SSFs consistently outperform traditional SSFs in predicting movement decisions. 5. We conclude by discussing methodological considerations and future directions for integrating learning into movement ecology. By explicitly modelling the formation of memory that integrates both spatial information and habitat quality, our approach advances process-based movement ecology while remaining compatible with standard SSA workflows, offering practical tools for both theoretical research and applied wildlife management.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Why did the animal turn? Time-varying step selection analysis for inference between observed turning points in high frequency data 95%
- BirdFlow: Learning Seasonal Bird Movements from Citizen Science Data 95%
- Mitigating pseudoreplication and bias in resource selection functions with autocorrelation-informed weighting 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying stationary phases in multivariate time-series for highlighting behavioural modes and home range settlements 93%
- How to make more from exposure data? An integrated machine learning pipeline to predict pathogen exposure 93%
- Accounting for individual-specific variation in habitat-selection studies: Efficient estimation of mixed-effects models using Bayesian or frequentist computation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.