VITAL-3D: Volumetric Single-Cell Quantification Reveals Microenvironment-Dependent Drug Responses in Breast Cancer
Wu, P.-H.; Jin, C.; Chu, T.; Zhang, Q.; Wirtz, D.
Show abstract
Preclinical drug evaluation relies heavily on two-dimensional (2D) monolayer assays, which fail to recapitulate the structural and functional complexity of the tumor microenvironment and may therefore misrepresent therapeutic efficacy. Here, we present VITAL (Volumetric Imaging-based Toxicity and Live Analysis), a high-throughput imaging platform that enables direct single-cell quantification of proliferation and cell death in both 2D and three-dimensional (3D) extracellular matrix (ECM) cultures using a 96-well format. By combining volumetric imaging with automated single-cell analysis, VITAL enables dynamic assessment of drug responses beyond conventional viability assays and EC measurements. Using breast cancer cell lines treated with anticancer agents, we systematically compared drug responses between 2D and 3D microenvironments. Although EC values were often comparable between culture formats, growth kinetics and concentrations required to induce complete growth arrest or net cell loss differed substantially in 3D cultures. In particular, drug concentrations required to induce net cell loss were consistently higher in 3D, revealing microenvironment-dependent survival responses that were not captured by EC alone. Furthermore, clinically expected subtype-specific responses, including tamoxifen sensitivity in ER-positive cells and olaparib sensitivity in BRCA1-mutant cells, were more accurately resolved under 3D culture conditions and extended treatment durations. Together, these findings demonstrate that growth-based, single-cell quantification provides a more comprehensive assessment of therapeutic efficacy than conventional endpoint measurements and establish VITAL as a scalable platform for physiologically relevant preclinical drug screening.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- HIF-1 regulated TPM3 links hypoxia to motility and invasion beyond the hypoxic fraction in triple-negative breast cancer 94%
- Circulating tumor DNA dynamics using a standardized multi-gene panel in advanced breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibition and endocrine therapy 92%
- RNA Sequencing-Based Single Sample Predictors of Molecular Subtype and Risk of Recurrence for Clinical Assessment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Intracellular Optical Doppler Phenotypes of Chemosensitivity in Human Epithelial Ovarian Cancer 93%
- Migration rather than proliferation transcriptomic signatures are strongly associated with breast cancer patient survival 93%
- Towards integration of 64Cu-DOTA-Trasztusumab PET-CT and MRI with mathematical modeling to predict response to neoadjuvant therapy in HER2+ breast cancer 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Targeted transcript quantification in single disseminated cancer cells after whole transcriptome amplification 92%
- Systematic identification of pan-cancer single-gene expression biomarkers in drug high-throughput screens 92%
- Prognostic pan-cancer and single-cancer models: A large-scale analysis using a real-world clinico-genomic database 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep learning inference of cell type-specific gene expression from breast tumor histopathology 92%
- Multiplexed drug testing of tumor slices using a microfluidic platform 92%
- Development and validation of a gene expression score to account for tumour purity and improve prognostication in breast cancer 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Targeting tumor-stromal interactions in triple-negative breast cancer using a human vascularized micro-tumor model 92%
- Automated quantification of Ki-67 expression in breast cancer from H&E-stained slides using a transformer-based regression model 92%
- Lineage plasticity enables low-ER luminal tumors to evolve and gain basal-like traits 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.