Back

Trans-Allosteric Activation Releases Distinct Conformational Traps in Kinase Heterodimers

Imamoto, A.; Wu, Y.; Shinobu, A.; Okada, M.

2026-09-01 biophysics
10.64898/2026.08.31.748385 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Protein kinases function as dynamic, mechanically coupled nodes, yet the conformational drivers of multimeric activation remain unclear. Here, we present AlloQuant, a computational suite that translates AlphaFold3 structural ensembles into quantitative metrics of kinase regulation, including internal network rigidity, metastable-state populations, and sub-angstrom conformational drivers. Applying AlloQuant to CDK1, we demonstrate that binding of the Cyclin B1 (CCNB1) cofactor mechanically decouples a hyper-rigid inactive kinase core, allowing activating phosphorylation (pT161) to subsequently re-impose localized tension on the catalytic machinery. Conversely, the C-terminal Src kinase (CSK) faces a distinct conformational trap. While nucleotide-free monomeric CSK spontaneously samples a pre-active geometry, ATP binding excludes the active C-In conformation in all but 1 of 225 models. We show that docking partner engagement overcomes this blockade. Autophosphorylation of SRC at the activation loop (Y419) redistributes SRC conformational states without altering bulk rigidity. This redistribution is structurally coupled to the conformational state of CSK via the regulatory spine, not the catalytic machinery. Rather than mechanically deforming CSK, SRC engagement acts by conformational selection, committing roughly a quarter of CSK molecules to a fully active state. Thus, trans-allosteric kinase activation operates by defining the accessible conformational landscape of the receiver kinase. That control is exerted through mechanical remodeling in cofactor-dependent complexes and through conformational selection in transient kinase-kinase heterodimers. These findings establish AlloQuant as a general framework for quantifying how a binding partner reshapes a kinase's conformational landscape, applicable across the kinome because it assigns landmarks by profile-HMM alignment.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.