Back

A transition state-like acylenzyme conformation distinguishes carbapenemase activity in class A β-lactamases

Beer, M.; Spencer, J.; Mulholland, A. J.

2026-09-01 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.08.31.748333 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Carbapenems are the most potent {beta}-lactams, key antibiotics for healthcare-associated infections by Gram-negative bacteria and evade hydrolysis by most {beta}-lactamases, but are increasingly threatened by emergence of enzymes exhibiting hydrolytic activity towards them. Of the four recognised {beta}-lactamase subclasses, class A (active-site serine enzymes that hydrolyse {beta}-lactams via a covalent acylenzyme intermediate) is the most widely disseminated and, while the majority of such enzymes react with carbapenems to form long-lasting acylenzyme complexes, several possess carbapenem-hydrolyzing activity (carbapenemases). Here, we investigate the basis for these differences in a panel of class A {beta}-lactamases using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the respective acylenzyme complexes and tetrahedral intermediates (TI). The simulations reveal multiple features associated with catalytic activity across the spectrum of enzymes tested, including more extensive interactions of the carbapenem acylenzyme carbonyl and generally increased lifetimes of active site water molecules positioned for deacylation. Analysis of the dynamic trajectories shows carbapenemases to have reduced root mean-squared fluctuation (RMSF) differences between the acylenzyme and TI, that are not limited to the active site, indicating that the acylenzyme complex is pre-organised for reaction in carbapenemases but not in carbapenem-inhibited enzymes. Similarly, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of acylenzyme and TI dynamics shows greater overlap between the two states in carbapenemases, providing further evidence for acylenzyme pre-organisation. Such simulations may represent an effective computational assay able to identify enzymes with carbapenemase activity at relatively modest computational cost.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.