Back

Functional plasticity of AIF revealed by dimerization and CHCHD4 interaction states

Soriano, O.; Hernandez-Hatibi, S.; Gracia-Domingo, R.; Romero-Tamayo, S.; Ferrer, M.; Velazquez-Campoy, A.; Marco-Brualla, J.; Fernandez-Silva, P.; Susin, S. A.; Medina, M.; Moreno-Loshuertos, R.; Ferreira Neila, P.

2026-09-01 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.08.31.748248 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Apoptosis-inducing factor is a mitochondrial flavoprotein that links redox metabolism to mitochondrial homeostasis through its interaction with the disulfide relay protein CHCHD4. Although NADH-dependent AIF dimerization has been proposed as the activated state mediating CHCHD4 engagement, whether it is strictly required for productive AIF-CHCHD4 function remains unclear. Here, combining cellular, biochemical and biophysical approaches, we show that disruption of the AIF dimer interface compromises oxidative phosphorylation, respiratory-chain organization and CHCHD4-dependent mitochondrial homeostasis, yet preserves partial AIF function. Our data reveal that the AIF-CHCHD4 system operates as a conformational dynamic redox module in which distinct AIF oligomeric and redox states sustain CHCHD4 activity with different efficiencies. Mechanistically, dimerization is coupled to NADH-dependent conformational changes that regulate coenzyme binding, charge-transfer complex stabilization and catalytic efficiency. In turn, CHCHD4 binding remodels AIF conformational and redox properties, partially compensating for defects in dimer stabilization or redox coupling. Consistently, a peptide derived from the CHCHD4 N-terminus partially restores redox function in a pathogenic AIF variant defective in dimer stabilization, supporting partner-assisted allosteric regulation as a potential therapeutic strategy.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.