Back

Both environmental filtering and intraspecific variation shape small mammals' elementomes

Montiel-Mora, J. R.; Chrastny, V.; Sipkova, A.; Sindelar, J.; Zarybnicka, M.; Rota, T.

2026-09-01 ecology
10.64898/2026.08.31.748240 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The biogeochemical niche hypothesis (BNH) proposes the multi-elemental composition of organisms - their elementome - as a new ecological dimension. However, which ecological factors shape elementome assembly remains little known, especially in animals. Here, we studied the mandibular elementome of two sympatric small mammals - Apodemus flavicollis and Clethrionomys glareolus - to assess how intraspecific variability (ontogenetic changes in body mass and sex under the vertebrate bone hypothesis; VBH) and environmental filtering (season and habitat) shape essential and non-essential elementome assembly. Species showed moderate elementome segregation and seasonal niche partitioning, with implications for coexistence. Ontogenetic body mass predicted elemental variation and calcium substitution, with several hypermetric scalings in autumn indicating strong departures from mass-invariant homeostasis. Finally, our results suggest a dichotomy: essential elementomes were mainly driven by intraspecific variation, whereas non-essential elementomes were rather shaped by environmental filtering. Our results position animal elementomes as an integrative ecological dimension linking organismal biology, species interactions, and environmental filtering across individuals, populations, and species.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Functional Ecology
○ 61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Nature Ecology & Evolution
131 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
● 393 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.2%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Ecology Letters
○ 135 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.5%
Similar papers in this journal
5
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.9%
6
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 23%
6.9%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
7
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.4%
8
The American Naturalist
● 125 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.9%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 16%
3.3%
10
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
● 72 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
11
PLOS Biology
● 486 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
12
Global Ecology and Biogeography
○ 47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
13
Ecography
○ 54 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
14
Oikos
○ 84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
Ecology and Evolution
○ 267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
16
Current Biology
○ 665 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.3%
17
Evolution
◐ 225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Molecular Ecology
○ 336 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
20
Peer Community Journal
● 281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
BMC Biology
○ 265 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
○ 69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 38%
0.8%
25
Biological Reviews
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
26
Journal of Biogeography
○ 46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
27
Systematic Biology
◐ 144 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
28
Ecology
○ 85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Evolution Letters
◐ 85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Molecular Biology and Evolution
◐ 542 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.