Back

Embedding wear assessment in musculoskeletal simulation: A proof-of-concept application to total hip arthroplasty

Di Pietro, A.; Mattei, L.; Di Puccio, F.

2026-09-02 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.08.31.748225 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Predicting wear in artificial joints requires integrating joint dynamics, contact mechanics and progressive surface evolution, yet these processes are often treated separately. In total hip arthroplasty (THA), finite-element approaches remain the reference standard, but they are computationally demanding and usually rely on boundary conditions from independent musculoskeletal (MSK) models, hindering consistent coupling and feedback between wear progression and movement dynamics. As a single-subject proof of concept, we present a computational framework that embeds wear estimation within forward MSK simulations through OpenSim-MATLAB integration. Contact variables are computed using an elastic-foundation formulation, and wear is updated through the Archard law, enabling cyclic prediction of contact mechanics and surface evolution within a single workflow at practical computational cost. The framework was evaluated in one subject with right THA during five activities of daily living and numerically benchmarked against finite-element simulations. A long-term walking analysis of 4 million cycles was also performed to assess geometry updating. Across tasks, peak contact pressures remained within 7% of finite-element predictions. Linear wear depth and volumetric loss showed maximum deviations of 16% and 13%, respectively. Accounting for progressive geometry changes yielded a maximum wear depth about 31% lower than linear extrapolation. These preliminary results support the framework's computational feasibility and numerical consistency for the tested case; nevertheless, multi-subject evaluation is required before broader predictive or clinical use.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.