Back

Cryo-EM Structure of a Triazole alpha-Conotoxin GI Mimetic Bound to the Muscle-Type Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor

Shepperson, O.; Capper, M.; Holdship, C.; Melling, O.; Wade, N.; Malone, M.; Arnott, K.; Morgan, D.; Piggot, T.; Morcom, T.; Connah, J.; Windeln, L.; Timperley, C.; Frey, J.; Green, C.; Koehnke, J.; Essex, J.; Jamieson, A.

2026-09-01 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.08.31.748223 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Disulfide-rich peptides possess exceptional potency and selectivity but are often limited by the instability and synthetic challenges associated with native disulfide bonds. Here, we report the design, synthesis, pharmacological evaluation, and structural characterisation of triazole-based peptidomimetics of the -GI conotoxin, a selective antagonist of the muscle-type nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR). A series of 1,4- and 1,5-disubstituted triazole analogues were prepared entirely on resin using CuAAC and RuAAC chemistry to replace the native Cys3/13 disulfide bridge. Functional evaluation against human muscle nAChRs revealed that 1,5-triazole analogues retained low-nanomolar potency, with the lead mimetic exhibiting activity comparable to native -GI. Cryo-electron microscopy of the lead compound bound to the muscle-type nAChR provided the first structure of a disulfide-isostere peptidomimetic in complex with a membrane receptor. The structure demonstrates that the 1,5-triazole reproduces the native peptide fold with high fidelity while contributing receptor-facing interactions not available to the native disulfide bridge. Molecular dynamics simulations further revealed conserved hydration networks and similar conformational sampling between the native peptide and lead mimetic. Together, these findings establish triazoles as effective disulfide surrogates and provide a structural framework for the rational design of stabilised conotoxin therapeutics.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.