Back

Structural basis for catalytic and inhibitory divergence between archaeal and bacterial ammonia monooxygenases

Yang, X.; Mao, T.-Q.; He, Z.-C.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, G.; Jin, P.; Li, S.; Dong, H.-P.; Peng, W.; Zhang, C.; Li, Z.

2026-09-01 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.08.31.748207 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Ammonia oxidation initiates nitrification and is closely linked to microbial N2O production. Ammonia monooxygenase (AMO) catalyzes the first and rate-limiting step of nitrification and is widespread across evolutionarily distinct ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) and bacteria (AOB). The ocean is the largest biome for AOA and AOB, which have distinct ecological niches and markedly different sensitivities to nitrification inhibitors. However, the lack of archaeal AMO structures and inhibitor-bound AMO complexes has hindered mechanistic understanding of the architectural, catalytic, and inhibitory divergence between these two enzyme systems. Here, we report high-resolution cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of marine archaeal AMO captured in active and inactivated states within its native membrane environment, together with inhibitor-bound structures of estuarine bacterial AMO. Archaeal AMO forms an unexpected cup-shaped homotrimer composed of eight subunits per protomer and exhibits substantial architectural divergence from bacterial AMO. Integrated structural, biochemical, kinetic, and computational analyses reveal distinct periplasmic architectures, copper-center organization, and hydrophobic channels between archaeal and bacterial AMOs for ammonium acquisition, catalysis and inhibitor response. These findings provide a structural and mechanistic framework for understanding how archaeal and bacterial AMOs have diverged to distinct ammonia-oxidizing strategies and inhibitor susceptibilities across environmentally important ammonia oxidizers.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.