From Public Archive to Reusable Resource: Characterizing Gut Microbiome Metadata in the NCBI SRA
Oderman, K. A.; Nandi, T. N.; Malas, J.; Madduri, R. K.; Hampton-Marcell, J. T.
Show abstract
Public sequencing repositories contain large amounts of gut microbiome data that could support cross-study comparison, reproducibility analysis, and microbiome foundation model development. However, the extent to which these data are structured, harmonized, and reusable at archive scale remains unclear. Here, we characterized publicly available gut microbiome sequencing metadata from the NCBI Sequence Read Archive using Google BigQuery, focusing on human gut metagenome, mouse gut metagenome, and broadly annotated gut metagenome records. We evaluated temporal growth, sequencing depth, BioSample and BioProject structure, platform and instrument use, metadata completeness, host attribution, publication linkage, and research themes from linked literature. Public gut microbiome data increased substantially over time and were dominated by human-associated datasets and Illumina sequencing platforms. Core technical metadata fields were highly complete, but biological context needed for reuse, including host identity, phenotype, study design, and disease status, was often inconsistently encoded or required recovery from BioSample attributes and linked publications. In the generic "gut metagenome" cohort, host identity could be assigned for only 13.00% of BioSamples, highlighting the limitations of broad organism annotations for automated cohort construction. Publication linkage was also incomplete at the archive level, although usable text was recovered for most linked publications. Topic modeling of SRA-linked literature showed persistent emphasis on core gut microbiota composition and increasing representation of human cohort and infant microbiome studies. Overall, these findings show that public gut microbiome data are extensive and technically rich but not uniformly analysis ready. Improved metadata harmonization, publication linkage, and biological context recovery will be necessary to support reliable large-scale reuse and AI-ready microbiome data resources.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- HVRLocator: A Computationally Efficient Tool for Identifying Hypervariable Regions in 16S rRNA Big Datasets 94%
- IDseq - An Open Source Cloud-based Pipeline and Analysis Service for Metagenomic Pathogen Detection and Monitoring 92%
- Ultra-deep long-read metagenomics captures diverse taxonomic and biosynthetic potential of soil microbes 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Baseline human gut microbiota profile in healthy people and standard reporting template 94%
- Predicted meta-omics: a potential solution to multi-omics data scarcity in microbiome studies 94%
- FAVABEAN and FALAPhyl: Open-Source Pipelines for Scalable 16s rRNA Microbiome Data Processing and Visualization 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Metagenome-assembled genomes of Estonian Microbiome cohort reveal novel species and their links with prevalent diseases 95%
- Illumina Complete Long Read Assay yields contiguous bacterial genomes from human gut metagenomes 93%
- Addressing the dynamic nature of reference data: a new nt database for robust metagenomic classification 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.