Back

Antimicrobial resistance genomics across Africa: critical determinants, repository bias and regional coordination

Omani, R.; Maina, G. N.; Fasina, F. O.

2026-09-02 public and global health
10.64898/2026.08.31.26361859 medRxiv
Show abstract

Public genomic repositories can support antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance, but unequal sampling can bias interpretation. We characterised AMR determinants, multicountry genomic cluster overlap and surveillance gaps across Africa using an NCBI Pathogen Detection snapshot retrieved on 24 August 2026 for 55 African Union member states. Records were validated and deduplicated by BioSample, and complete AMRFinderPlus calls were summarised across five United Nations M49 subregions and eight overlapping regional economic communities (RECs). Country-pair cluster overlap was assessed using the Jaccard index, while project-based and composition-standardised sensitivity analyses evaluated repository bias. The dataset contained 86,829 unique BioSamples from 51 states; South Africa, Malawi and Kenya contributed 55.8%. Complete extended-spectrum {beta}-lactamase calls were detected in 21,513 isolates and carbapenemase calls in 4,642. blaCTX-M-15 dominated the ESBL profile, while NDM and OXA types predominated. Seventy clusters contained carbapenemase-positive isolates from at least two countries. A shared REC covered all participating countries in 38 clusters, while 32 crossed REC boundaries. Normalised country-pair overlap was low, with a maximum Jaccard index of 9.5%. Project balancing reduced the Northern African carbapenemase estimate from 32.3% to 17.9% and the Eastern African ESBL estimate from 36.9% to 12.5%. Public repositories identify determinants and clusters for investigation but do not estimate prevalence or transmission. AMR surveillance should combine national confirmation, regional institution-led investigation where countries share an REC, and continent-wide coordination through Africa CDC for cross-REC signals, supported by representative One Health sampling, standardised metadata and sustained African sequencing capacity.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.