Rest-activity and circadian rhythm parameters relate to cognition and disability outcomes in multiple sclerosis
Wolfova, K.; White, C.; Montazeri Ghahjaverestan, N.; Choeying, T.; Arevalo, R.; Onomichi, K.; Davis, L.; Leavitt, V. M.; Buyukturkoglu, K.; Riley, C.; Lim, A.; De Jager, P.
Show abstract
OBJECTIVE: To prioritize novel measures of disease progression, we examined whether actigraphy-derived rest-activity rhythm (RAR) parameters relate to cognitive performance as well as disability in a multiple sclerosis (MS) cohort enrolled in a prospective brain donation program. METHODS: RAR parameters were assessed using a wrist actigraphy device (AX3 Axivity Actiwatch, Axivity Ltd.) over two weeks. The primary outcome measure was the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT, N=222). Secondary outcomes included Brixton Spatial Anticipation Test and self-reported disability. In 76 participants, volumetric measures were derived from repurposed clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. We applied linear and logistic regression models, adjusting for age, sex, education, time since MS diagnosis, and body mass index. RESULTS: After correction for multiple comparisons, higher intradaily variability (IV) of RAR and lower relative amplitude were associated with worse SDMT performance; higher IV was also associated with greater odds of disability. A broader set of RAR parameters was associated with disability measure. No MRI parameters were related to RAR in the subset of individuals with available MRI data, although we note suggestive associations with hippocampal and choroid plexus volumes warranting further investigation. INTERPRETATION: More robust circadian rhythms were related to better cognition. These results highlight the utility of actigraphy and its more nuanced measures beyond the simple summaries of activity levels that quantitate the extent of motor disability. Selected RAR features may be an effective non-invasive approach to capture clinically relevant quantitative measures of brain function for persons with MS.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Accelerometry-derived activity fragmentation as a predictor of brain atrophy and disability progression in multiple sclerosis 97%
- Tissue damage detected by quantitative gradient echo MRI correlates with clinical progression in non-relapsing progressive MS 95%
- Paramagnetic rim lesions are associated with pathogenic CSF profiles and worse clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective cross-sectional study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Alpha-Linolenic Acid Associations with Disability and Brain Volume in Multiple Sclerosis: A Brief Replication Report 96%
- Current status and future opportunities in modeling Multiple Sclerosis clinical characteristics 93%
- Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis Causes Skeletal Muscle Dysfunction in Mice 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Choroid Plexus Enlargement in Secondary Progressive MS: phenotype comparison 93%
- Neural Correlates of Remotely versus In-person Administered Symbol Digit Modalities Test in Multiple Sclerosis 93%
- COVID-19 is associated with multiple sclerosis exacerbations that are prevented by disease modifying therapies 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccine response in people with multiple sclerosis 89%
- PET markers of tau and neuroinflammation are co-localized in progressive supranuclear palsy 88%
- Cellular and humoral immunity to SARS-CoV-2 infection in multiple sclerosis patients on ocrelizumab and other disease-modifying therapies: a multi-ethnic observational study 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Linking cortical lesions to metabolic changes in multiple sclerosis using 7T proton MR spectroscopy 92%
- Exploring the Role of Plasma Lipids and Statins Interventions on Multiple Sclerosis Risk and Severity: A Mendelian Randomization Study 90%
- White matter microstructural changes in adult-onset idiopathic focal cervical dystonia using ultra-strong diffusion gradient MRI 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.