Back

Principles of NMDA receptor co-agonism at cortical fast-spiking GABAergic interneurons in the adolescent prefrontal cortex

Souza, I. N. d. O.; Lecouflet, P.; Okur, Z.; Maldera, S.; Potier, B.; Pollegioni, L.; Scheiffele, P.; Mothet, J.-P.

2026-09-03 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.08.30.747826 bioRxiv
Show abstract

N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) populate fast-spiking (FS)-parvalbumin-positive (PV+) GABAergic interneurons (INs), where they play a critical role in shaping circuit motifs and memory. However, it is largely unknown whether and how NMDARs at FS-PV+-INs are gated by their co-agonists and the functional relevance of such modulations for their synaptic coupling with excitatory neurons. Here, we report that FS-PV+-INs in the adolescent mouse prefrontal cortex, an area central to complex cognitive operation exhibit functional GluN2B/D containing NMDARs. These receptors contribute to the excitatory drive of FS-PV+-INs and to the feedforward inhibition, controlling short-term and long-term synaptic plasticity. While the identity of the co-agonist controlling GABAergic tone is tuned by the synaptic activity regime from D-serine to glycine, we reveal that it remains largely unchanged at the excitatory synapse with D-serine being the sole co-agonist gating NMDARs. Lastly, we show that D-serine-deficient mice, a model of NMDAR hypofunction show selective attenuation of PV+-INs excitation together with selective loss of temporal summation and long-term plasticity at the excitatory synapse. Our study reveals the segregation of pools of NMDARs at the soma and dendrites that are differently sensitive to D-serine or glycine, the existence of distinct modes of activity-dependent regulation of these NMDARs by their co-agonists at this major type of GABAergic INs, and hence the rules governing cortical inhibition by FS-PV+-INs during a critical period of late postnatal development.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.