Back

Effect of Mushroom-Bacteria Co-culture on Mushroom Growth and Antimicrobial Properties

Wang, E.; Cavanaugh, N. T.; He, Y.; Chai, Y.

2026-08-31 microbiology
10.64898/2026.08.30.747672 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Edible mushrooms have been reported to have antimicrobial properties and other health benefits. This study aims to test the antimicrobial activities of several edible mushrooms from markets and test if co-culturing them with bacteria could induce stronger anti-bacterial properties. Commercial mushrooms, Hericium erinaceus (lions mane), Pleurotus ostreatus (oyster mushroom), Lentinula edodes (Shiitake) and Agaricus bisporus (button mushroom), were grown from strictly controlled/sterile substrates. Ethanol and water extracts from the mushrooms were prepared and tested against the bacteria Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Bacillus subtilis, and the fungus Candida albicans for antimicrobial activities. Shiitake water extract (SWE) showed strong antibacterial effects against all tested bacterial species, inhibitory effects on their biofilms, and antifungal activity. The antimicrobials in SWE seem to damage the cell wall and cell membrane of the bacteria, prefer weak acidic conditions, and are heat labile. Some antimicrobials are likely proteins and polysaccharides. In contrast, 3 other mushrooms displayed only weak antimicrobial effects. The fast-growing lions mane and oyster mushroom were co-cultured with different bacteria. The co-cultivation promoted the fruiting body development of lions mane. Co-culturing with S. aureus increased the anti-bacterial effects of lions mane against S. aureus, E. coli and particularly B. subtilis. Co-culturing the oyster mushroom with bacteria, especially B. subtilis and P. aeruginosa, boosted the mushroom growth. All tested bacteria, especially S. aureus, increased oyster mushroom anti-bacterial effect against E. coli and B. subtilis. The findings indicate that mushroom-bacteria co-culturing could have benefits both agriculturally and medicinally.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.