Back

Feasibility study of gait analysis using a new Wearable Force Plate

Sanz Morere, C. B.; Garrido-Lopez, G.; Hayase, M.; Rueda, J.; An, Q.; Shimoda, S.; Moreno, J. C.; Navarro, E.

2026-09-02 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.08.30.26361786 medRxiv
Show abstract

Static force plates (FP) are the gold standard for measuring ground reaction forces (GRF) and computing joint moments through inverse dynamics in gait analysis. However, they are restricted to controlled environments, and the number of steps analyzed is limited by the plates embedded in the floor. To address these limitations, portable solutions such as sensorized insoles, socks, or shoes have emerged. Yet, creating wearable systems capable of measuring three-dimensional GRF in real-world conditions remains challenging. Current sensorized shoes often incorporate thick sensors (up to 2 cm), reducing usability and limiting their application in pathological populations or dynamic tasks like running. This study evaluates the usability of ShokacShoes, a novel sensorized shoe integrating three thin, three-dimensional force sensors, and explores its potential as a Wearable Force Plate (WFP). Eight healthy participants performed slow, natural, and fast walking using two insole configurations. Force and temporal metrics were derived from WFP and FP data. Results indicate that WFP enables accurate step segmentation and detects significant effects of speed and insole type on temporal and force metrics, confirming its reliability under different walking conditions. Comparisons with FP revealed differences in force metrics and signal morphology, though temporal parameters remained consistent. These results are likely due to sensor quantity and positioning. Thereby, ShokacShoes represent a valid solution capable of measuring three-dimensional forces within commercial footwear. Future work will focus on validating the applicability of a new version of ShokacShoes against gold-standard FP in a comprehensive validation study involving diverse real-world scenarios and pathological conditions.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.