Slider Horizontal Movement and Arm Angle are Associated with Elbow and Forearm Injury Incidence in MLB Pitchers
Richards, C.; La Salle, D. T.; Vila Dieguez, O.; Ward, S. R.
Show abstract
Background: Sweeping sliders with large horizontal break are hypothesized to be associated with arm injury, and prior work suggests a link between slider usage, arm angle, and injury. Purpose: To evaluate whether arm angle and slider horizontal movement are associated with elbow or forearm injury risk in MLB pitchers. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study; Level of evidence, 3 Methods: Statcast data from 2020-2025 and injury data were used to study the relationship between sliders and arm injuries. Pitchers with at least 30 innings pitched (IP) were evaluated for same- and next-season injury incidence to the Elbow, Forearm, or Elbow/Forearm. A generalized additive model (GAM) related pitch-level variables to injury incidence, and average marginal effect (AME) odds ratios are reported for main effects. Results: All fits were significant at p<.01. Fits for same-season (N=1,957, p=.00008, R2=.066) and next-season (N=2,511, p=.00005, R2=.053) Elbow/Forearm injury were significant at p<.001. Same-season (R2=.061) and next-season (R2=.055) Forearm injury fits had p=.001. Main effects for slider glove-side movement and fastball usage, their interactions with arm angle, and arm angle main effects were the most predictive features. Across the three fits where the slider glove-side movement main effect was significant, odds ratios ranged from 1.03 to 1.07, meaning that each additional inch of slider glove-side movement was associated with a 3% to 7% increase in the observed injury incidence. Furthermore, this effect was magnified at high arm angle and muted at low arm angle. Conclusion: We observed that slider horizontal movement, arm angle, and their interaction were significantly associated with incidence of Forearm and combined Elbow/Forearm injury. This effect was weak or non-existent at low arm angles and strong at high arm angles, suggesting that arm angle moderates the risk of slider horizontal movement, and providing evidence that sliders with large horizontal break (e.g. sweepers) may pose an injury risk. Keywords: baseball; sweeper; slider; arm angle; horizontal movement; elbow injury; forearm injury
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of short-term resistance training and tapering on maximal strength, peak power, throwing ball velocity, and sprint performance in handball players 96%
- Subconcussive head impact exposure differences between drill intensities in U.S. high school football 95%
- Are isokinetic leg torques and kick velocity reliable predictors for competitive success in taekwondo athletes? 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying paddling kinematic through muscle activation and whole body coordination during maximal sprint of different duration on a kayak ergometer: a pilot study 95%
- Practical recommendations for staying physically active during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic literature review 94%
- The effect of breaking up sedentary time with calisthenics on neuromuscular function: a preliminary study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Differences in external loads of different pitch types in Chinese male college baseball players 96%
- Do anthropometric characteristics and physical capacities of highly trained junior badminton players differ according to age and sex? 95%
- Head and body dyskinesia during gait in tactical athletes with vestibular deficit following concussion 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perception of yips among professional Japanese golfers: perspectives and challenges 95%
- Muscle activity of cutting manoeuvres and soccer inside passing suggests an increased groin injury risk during these movements 94%
- Joint contact forces during barefoot, minimal and conventional shod running are highly individual 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.