Incremental Value of CSF Biomarker-Integrated Classification of Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy

Background: The Boston Criteria v2.0 represent the gold standard for diagnosing Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy (CAA), but their application is currently precluded in mixed small vessel disease (SVD), where deep and lobar hemorrhages coexist. The aims of this study are: (i) to determine which cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker (A{beta}42, A{beta}40, A{beta}42/40 ratio) is the best candidate to support the CAA diagnosis; (ii) to define a data-driven cut-off, and (iii) to explore if a biomarker-integrated classification significantly improves the phenotypical concordance with the suspected predominant SVD (CAA vs. arteriosclerosis). Methods: We analyzed data from a retrospective multicenter cohort of patients with suspected CAA, defined as probable CAA (Boston criteria v2.0) but allowing deep hemorrhagic lesions, and with available CSF biomarkers. We visually quantified MRI-visible SVD markers (e.g., cerebral microbleeds [CMB], cortical superficial siderosis [cSS], lacunes) and their association with MRI-visible SVD features. We employed a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) to identify a data-driven threshold for amyloid positivity (A+). Then, we compared the prevalence of MRI-visible manifestations of SVD between subgroups applying different frameworks, namely the current MRI-based classification (probable CAA vs. mixed SVD) and a CSF biomarker-integrated classification (A+ vs. A-). Results: We enrolled 121 patients (age: 72 [66-77] years; 60% probable CAA, 40% mixed SVD with suspected CAA). The CSF A{beta}42/40 ratio showed a bimodal distribution and consistent associations with all CAA-specific radiological features. The CSF biomarker-integrated reclassification, particularly using the GMM cut-off, significantly improved the distinction between subgroups regarding CAA- and arteriosclerosis-related MRI features (e.g., cSS presence: probable CAA vs. mixed SVD: aOR=2.84 [95%CI 1.27-6.39], p=0.011; A+ vs. A-: aOR=12.68 [95%CI 4.31-37.32], p<0.001; deep lacunes presence: probable CAA vs. mixed SVD: aOR=0.20 [95%CI 0.08-0.50], p<0.001; A+ vs. A-: aOR=0.04 [95%CI 0.01-0.11], p<0.001). Notably, patients classified as A+ never demonstrated more than four deep CMBs. Discussion: A CSF biomarker-integrated classification may improve the classification of CAA compared with the current MRI-based framework. These findings are cohort-specific and would benefit from further validation, especially with a neuropathological reference. Still, these results support a future transition toward an integrated biological-radiological framework, which may refine in vivo CAA diagnosis, particularly in mixed SVD.