A record-breaking heatwave reduces breeding success and impairs growth in a wild bird population
Lopez-Idiaquez, D.; Satarkar, D.; Sheldon, B. C.
Show abstract
Most evidence of the consequences of climate change in natural systems has focussed on shifts in mean temperature (1,2), but the effects of extreme climatic events (ECEs) remain far less understood. This is particularly true for very severe ECEs that may occur only once every few decades. Understanding the consequences of these severe events for natural populations is nonetheless critical, since their frequency is predicted to rise under current climate change (3). Here we combine a unique long-term dataset spanning almost five decades of breeding (>20,000 events) and morphological data (>120,000 observations) in adult and nestling great tits (Parus major) and blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) with fine-scale temperature records to examine the effects of an unprecedented heatwave in May 2026 on breeding success and morphology. Average temperature during the heatwave (22-29 May 2026) was 7.85 C above the historical record, reaching +10.5 C (+4.32 SD) at its peak (25-26 May). These record-breaking temperatures significantly reduced adult breeding success and nestling bmass relative to expectation in the absence of a heat-wave. Given the heatwave was widespread (Fig. 1A), our findings from a single, exceptionally well-studied population are likely to generalise to other species exposed to the same event, providing key evidence that severe ECEs can substantially harm wild populations.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evolutionary trade-offs between heat and cold tolerance limit responses to fluctuating climates 92%
- Impact of Holocene environmental change on the evolutionary ecology of an Arctic top predator 90%
- Transformation of coral communities subjected to an unprecedented heatwave is modulated by local disturbance 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.