Back

Mapping the Health Burden of Neighbourhood Deprivation: Neurobiological Evidence Across the Life Span

Ebneabbasi, A.; Warrier, V.; Montagnese, M.; Romero Garcia, R.; Bethlehem, R. A. I.; Rittman, T.

2026-08-31 public and global health
10.64898/2026.08.29.26361714 medRxiv
Show abstract

Neighbourhood deprivation is one of the few potential policy-modifiable risk factors for psychiatric and neurological disorders, but the neurobiological pathways underlying these associations remain unclear. We investigated these relationships across three cohorts spanning the life span: the Healthy Brain and Child Development (HBCD) Study (n = 84, aged 0 to 4 weeks postnatal), the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study (n = 4,792, aged 9 to 10 years), and the UK Biobank (UKB; approximately 500,000 adults, aged 44 to 87 years). Neighbourhood deprivation was associated with elevated disease risk, and individual lifestyle factors accounted for only a small fraction of this burden, indicating that the much larger residual effect reflects broader contextual characteristics of deprived environments rather than individual behaviours alone. Across all cohorts, greater deprivation consistently predicted lower cortical and subcortical brain volume, with effects detectable in early development and substantially stronger in adulthood. Across disorders, regional brain volume emerged as a consistent neuroanatomical mediator linking neighbourhood deprivation to neuropsychiatric disease. We further showed that deprivation preferentially affects brain regions intrinsically vulnerable to neuropsychiatric disorders. Spatial decoding analyses implicated dopaminergic and serotonergic neurotransmitter systems together with specific excitatory and inhibitory neuronal classes. Importantly, both the deprivation effects and their neuroanatomical mediation patterns were replicated across independent populations. Our study delivers a translational framework linking neighbourhood deprivation to brain health, which could inform public health policies and preventive interventions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.