Back

Automated wildlife re-identification by merging information from multiple body parts: A case study in sea turtles

Adam, L.; Montagna, M.; Roma, V.; Mancini, A.; Papafitsoros, K.

2026-08-31 ecology
10.64898/2026.08.28.747856 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Wildlife re-identification (re-ID) is a widely used and powerful tool with diverse applications in animal ecology and conservation. Current automated methods typically operate on single images of a single body part of the animal. However, a single encounter may contain multiple images capturing different body regions, each providing complementary individual-specific information. In contrast to automated approaches, researchers often manually select the most suitable images and regions for identification based on factors like visibility, occlusion and image quality. This creates a mismatch between automated methods and field practice, limiting the practical adoption of current automated re-ID pipelines. Here, we address this by introducing an encounter-based, multi-body-part re-ID framework, using sea turtles as a model taxon. Our framework combines three elements: (1) An orientation-aware deep learning model, TurtleDetector, that in addition to the full bodies, it also automatically segments key body regions, i.e. heads, front and hind flippers, from images within an encounter; (2) a hybrid body-part-specific retrieval method, that sequentially combines a fast global-feature model (MiewID or DINOv3) with a more accurate but costlier local-feature model (ALIKED with LightGlue); and (3) a merged identity-prediction strategy that selects the highest calibrated similarity score across all available body parts and images of an encounter. We evaluate the framework on three long-term re-ID datasets spanning three species, loggerheads, greens, and hawksbill turtles, under an evaluation protocol that mirrors real-world, time-aware re-ID workflows. Across datasets, combining multiple body regions consistently improved identification performance over the best-performing single body region, resulting to an increase of 4-6% in top-1 accuracy. Interestingly, body regions traditionally underused in sea turtle re-ID, such as the hind flippers and carapaces, provided complementary identifying information that improved encounter-level re-ID when integrated through the hybrid retrieval method. Our findings demonstrate that automated wildlife re-ID can benefit from moving beyond single-image, single-body-part identification towards encounter-level integration of all available visual evidence. Our work further suggests that, where feasible, field photo-acquisition protocols should aim to capture multiple informative views of an individual during each encounter. Importantly, many species and taxa, including elephants, primates, cetaceans, and other large vertebrates, possess such individual-specific features across multiple body regions, highlighting the broad potential applicability of our framework.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.