Back

Rational Control of Basal CAR Expression Improves Discrimination in Inducible T Cell Circuits

Hoces, D.; Ng, J.; Perez, J.; Hernandez-Lopez, R. A.

2026-08-31 synthetic biology
10.64898/2026.08.28.747722 bioRxiv
Show abstract

SynNotch-CAR circuits improve T cell specificity by coupling antigen recognition to inducible CAR expression. However, basal CAR expression without receptor activation, termed here as leakiness, can reduce the separation between killing of intended target cells and sparing of antigen-positive off-target cells, limiting target-cell discrimination. Here, we systematically quantified basal CAR expression for several synNotch-CAR designs and developed a coupled ordinary differential equation model to show that discrimination depends on basal output, CAR potency, and effector-to-target ratio. We introduced C-terminal tags such as fluorescent proteins, degron domains, endocytosis signals, and endoplasmic reticulum retention motifs as a strategy to reduce CAR leakiness. We found that fluorescent proteins and degron-containing tags reduced basal CAR surface expression while preserving antigen-induced CAR expression, improving discrimination of antigen-density sensing and combinatorial circuits in vitro. In xenograft models, fluorescent protein-tagged CARs improved discrimination by reducing activity against off-target cells while retaining activity against high-antigen tumors. Degron-containing constructs reduced basal CAR expression in vitro but showed suboptimal performance in vivo, revealing a trade-off between basal CAR suppression and induced CAR persistence. Together, these findings demonstrate that basal output expression is a key parameter for inducible genetic circuit designs and establish layered transcriptional and post-translational regulation as a strategy to improve the fidelity of inducible T cell circuits.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.