Back

BanffNET, a Deep Learning System for Comprehensive Histological Lesion Quantification in Kidney Transplant Biopsies

Buzzanca, G.; Pala, C.; He, J.; Hofstraat-Boersma, R.; Tammaro, A.; van Midden, D.; Buelow, R.; Hoelscher, D. L.; Muehlfeld, A. S.; Koeller, m.; Kozakowski, N.; Boehmig, G.; Halloran, P. F.; van der Helm, D.; Meziyerh, S.; Venhuizen, J.-H.; Haitjema, S.; Dijkstra, J.; Hilbrands, L. B.; Steenbergen, E. J.; van Zuilen, A. D.; Nurmohamed, A. S.; Bemelman, F. J.; Bruns, I. B.; Callegaro, G.; van de Water, B.; Pieters, T. T.; Breimer, G. E.; Rossi, G. M.; Fiaccadori, E.; Maggiore, U.; Roelofs, J. J. T. H.; Testa, F.; Fontana, F.; Abiola, A. A.; Delsante, M.; Corthals, G. L.; Peters-Sengers, H.; Ngu

2026-09-02 pathology
10.64898/2026.08.28.26360029 medRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate, reproducible interpretation of kidney allograft biopsies is critical for diagnosis of graft injury to guide prognosis and management. The international Banff classification is a consensus diagnostic system based on semiquantitative histological lesion scoring on either extent or severity of kidney transplant biopsies. However, pathologist scoring is limited by substantial interobserver variability, constrained scalability, and the inherent nature of the scoring system itself. Here we present BanffNET, a weakly supervised, probabilistic deep learning framework that combines self-supervised feature extraction with a novel Bayesian multiple-instance learning framework to predict (continuously) the full spectrum of Banff lesion scores directly from whole-slide images (WSIs). Using lesion-specific aggregation functions tailored to localized (modeling lesion severity) and diffuse pathologies (modeling lesion extent), BanffNET generates interpretable, patch-level probability maps and calibrated slide-level scores. BanffNET's performance was assessed relative to consensus, biological correlates of rejection and clinical outcome, demonstrating superior consistency, transportability and generalization. Trained on 7,249 WSIs from three cohorts, BanffNET demonstrates consistent performance on 11,028 WSIs across five external test sets, performing on par or exceeding expert consensus across lesions. BanffNET scores align more closely than pathologist Banff scores with molecular profiles of rejection, offering a transparent, biologically grounded framework for computational pathology with relevance beyond transplantation.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.