Back

Two evolutionary histories in one nucleus: genome remodeling and allelic regulation underlying heterosis in hybrid oil palm

Su, X.; Peng, Y.; Yang, X.; Zhang, F.; Xu, Q.; Ma, Z.; Dong, Y.; Zhou, L.; Xue, H.; Cao, X.; Zou, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zeng, X.

2026-08-31 genomics
10.64898/2026.08.27.747553 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Oil palm (Elaeis) is the primary source of global vegetable oil. Interspecific hybrids of Elaeis exhibit pronounced heterosis by integrating two distinct subgenomes into a single nucleus, effectively combining the high yield of African oil palm (E. guineensis) with the high unsaturated fatty acid content and disease resistance of American oil palm (E. oleifera). However, the genetic basis underlying heterosis is still unclear. Here, we combine phased genome assembly, comparative genomics, evolutionary genomics and haplotype-aware transcriptomics to unravel the genetic architecture of heterosis of hybrid oil palm. We assemble the highly heterozygous F1 genome ('Reyou 40', 3.75% heterozygosity) into a complete 1.73 Gb T2T haplotype (HapG) and a 1.84 Gb near-T2T haplotype (HapO with17 gaps). Despite 91.56% sequence identity, HapG and HapO diverged in LTR-RT occurrence and PAV affected genes, showing complementary biases in lipid metabolism and stress responses, respectively. Evolutionary genomics revealed that ancient WGDs preserved the palm family. Whereas lineage-specific lipid-related gene expansions in oil palm. Six ancient introgressed regions (~64 Mb) in HapG were reshaped by transposable elements and tandem duplication, showing an enrichment of genes related to resistance and lipid metabolism. Transcriptomically, 82.2% of allelic gene pairs maintained balanced expression, accompanied by parental functional complementarity and dosage buffering, revealing a potential regulatory basis for coordinating parental genetic differences in the hybrid genome. These haplotype-resolved genomic resources offer vital targets for understanding heterosis and accelerating oil palm molecular breeding.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.