Back

Disrupting Myeloid Persistence and Replenishment Enables Sustained Control of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Lung, B. C.-c.; Leung, A. K.-k.; Liu, S.; Wong, C. W.-Y.; Lai, T. H.; Wong, I. Y.-h.; Lung, C. C. H.; Lo, A. W.-i.; Kam, N.-W.; Ko, J. M.-Y.; Dai, W.; Kwong, D. L.-w.; Law, S.; Scodeller, P.; Lung, M.; Yu, V. Z.

2026-08-28 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.08.27.747541 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Responses to macrophage-directed therapy can be transient because tumors preserve myeloid support through complementary persistence and replenishment. In esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), CSF1R inhibition reduced established tumor-associated macrophages but was followed by expansion of Ly6C/CCR2-positive monocytic and Ly6G-positive granulocytic populations. Low-dose decitabine preferentially restricted recruited populations while sparing a LYVE1-associated macrophage state, exposing reciprocal pharmacologic blind spots. Combined treatment suppressed both arms and produced sustained control across patient-derived organoid xenograft, orthotopic, and immunocompetent models. Neutrophil depletion reproduced initial regression but not sustained control, indicating that the recruited escape arm extended beyond Ly6G-positive granulocytes. Single-cell profiling mapped these vulnerabilities onto a treatment-resolved myeloid architecture comprising a C1qa-positive TAM continuum, a C1qa-negative Ccr2/Ly6c2-high inflammatory monocytic-like compartment, and a LYVE1/MRC1-positive tissue-supportive macrophage state. Human ESCC contained corresponding macrophage programs and an adverse-outcome-associated LYVE1-rich niche. These findings identify state-aware coverage of complementary myeloid vulnerabilities as a strategy to overcome escape from macrophage-directed therapy.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.