Back

Female song and breeding phenology of the Nilgiri Flycatcher (Eumyias albicaudatus) in the Shola Sky Islands

Vyas, H.; Arvind, C.; Mangalasami, S.; Vijayan, R.

2026-08-28 ecology
10.64898/2026.08.27.747512 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Assessing breeding phenology using singing intensity can potentially provide insights into a species' responses to climate or habitat change. Although male passerines are known to sing elaborate songs during the breeding season, females of several tropical passerines also sing. The Nilgiri Flycatcher (Eumyias albicaudatus) is an endemic dimorphic songbird found in the southern Western Ghats of India. Despite its limited distribution and its ecological significance as an indicator species of cloud forests, very little is known about its vocal behaviour and breeding ecology. To examine sex-specific differences in vocalisation patterns, we analysed 294 male and 102 female focal songs from two pairs of birds. We then used data from a year-long automated recorder placed near a breeding pair to study the species' singing phenology using the BirdNET Analyser. The two sexes broadly produced similar songs, although males' songs included more notes at a faster pace. The sex-specific detectors failed due to this high similarity among songs of the two sexes, but we were able to automate species-level detection (F1-score = 0.795 at a confidence threshold of 0.1). We found strong seasonality in vocal activity, with peaks in singing during the breeding season, and identified a diurnal peak at dawn. More data are required to parameterise differences in annual vocal activity between the sexes. These detection patterns provide a framework for a landscape-wide examination of Nilgiri Flycatcher phenology and occurrence. This study suggests that automatic detectors can be a reliable tool for assessing singing phenology in birds and provide insights into breeding periods.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.