Back

Watching Others Lift Objects: Corticospinal Excitability is Greater During the Observation of Light than Heavy Lifts

Szekely, O.; Bultitude, J.; Chambers, C.; Preatoni, E.; Davies, J.; Buckingham, G.

2026-08-31 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.08.27.747509 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Past studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation have shown larger motor-evoked potentials when people observe someone lifting a heavy object than when they observe someone lifting a light one. This means that observers may engage their own motor system in proportion to the perceived effort. However, the different responses during the observation of light and heavy objects may have been influenced by predictable trial sequences within blocked presentation, making it unclear whether corticospinal excitability reflects online processing of kinematics or is affected by top-down expectations. In this Registered Report, 57 right-handed participants passively observed videos of a precision grip and lift of heavy and light objects while receiving a single-pulse TMS to the left primary motor cortex during the lift phase of the movement. Motor-evoked potentials were recorded from the right first dorsal interosseous muscle. The study compared two main observation contexts: a predictable trial sequence in which repeated videos of the same lifts were presented in a blocked order, and an unpredictable one in which videos were presented semi-randomly and participants could rely only on kinematic cues to perceive the weight of the lifted object. In both conditions, the same videos of lifts of equivalent-looking heavy and light objects were used and only the order of presentation differed. Contrary to our predictions, in the blocked (predictable) condition, there was no significant difference in MEPs elicited by light and heavy lifts. In the unpredictable condition, participants showed greater corticospinal excitability during the observation of the light lifts compared to the heavy lifts. This suggests that in the absence of predictable information, the corticospinal system was sensitive to the observed kinematics, but contrary to previous findings, its excitability varied inversely with the object weight.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.