Back

Systematic Evaluation of Nasal Immune Cell Sampling and Antigen-specific T cell Detection using Cryopreserved Nasal Swabs

Huisman, W.; Power, M. A.; le Bert, N.; Mitsi, E.; Verleur, N.; King, L. A.; de Vos, D. W.; Loe-Sack-Sioe, G. E.; Wagstaffe, H. R.; Hagedoorn, R. S.; Satti, I.; GeurtsvanKessel, C. H.; Marchant, A.; Pannus, P.; Heemskerk, M. H. M.; McShane, H.; Thwaites, R. S.; Chiu, C.; Groeneveld, G. H.; Ferreira, D.; de Vries, R. D.; Jochems, S. P.

2026-09-01 immunology
10.64898/2026.08.27.747456 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The upper respiratory tract is a key entry point for pathogens, yet local tissue-resident memory T cells (Trm) remain underexplored compared to peripheral blood. We systematically compared nasal curettes and 8 different swab types for immune cell collection, assessing yield, operator variability, and T cell phenotypes across the three turbinates and nasopharynx. The use of flocked swabs yielded higher immune cell numbers while being similarly tolerated, especially with reduced sampling duration. Nasal Trm subsets were consistent across the turbinates, whereas nasopharyngeal Trm displayed a more recently recruited phenotype. Multiple cryopreservation media were evaluated and all demonstrated high viability after thawing. Antigen-specificity was assessed using the activation induced marker (AIM) assay, peptideHLA tetramers and bulk TCR-sequencing following expansion. Notably, influenza-specific T cell frequencies were reliably detected by AIM and correlated between fresh and cryopreserved nasal samples. Downregulation of the CD3/TCR complex was observed in nasal samples. These findings establish a robust approach for nasal Trm profiling, demonstrating that cryopreservation preserves functional antigen-specific T cells. This work enables centralized, minimally invasive nasal T cell analysis for multicenter studies, including mucosal vaccination trials and controlled human infection models.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.