Back

Multi-omic characterization of axolotl perilymph-cerebrospinal fluid reveals shifts in composition during limb regeneration

Lopez, N.; Zhang, B.; Shuken, S. R.; Zhou, Y.; Payzin-Dogru, D.; Paoli, J. C.; Striker, A. E.; Wu, S. Y. C.; Patel, T. S.; Chan, K.; Böhm, S.; Singer, H. D.; Juarez, A. R.; Kim, R. T.; Shugart, L.; Chouchani, E. T.; Whited, J. L.

2026-08-28 systems biology
10.64898/2026.08.27.747356 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The axolotl salamander can fully regenerate amputated limbs, yet the systemic consequences underlying this process remain largely understudied. Cerebrospinal fluid is an emerging signaling medium capable of communicating with both the central and peripheral nervous systems, but its composition and potential role in salamander limb regeneration have not yet been examined using modern multi-omics techniques. Here, we developed a protocol for extracting mixed perilymph-cerebrospinal fluid (P-CSF) from axolotl and provided the first proteomic and metabolomic characterization of this biological fluid. We identified 2,626 unique proteins and 173 high-confidence metabolites and quantified them across four time points of early limb regeneration. We demonstrated that limb amputation drives progressive shifts in P-CSF proteins, including an elevation of sarcomeric muscle proteins, regeneration-associated factors, and protease/extracellular matrix proteins. We observed shifts in metabolites involved in oxidative stress, polyunsaturated fatty acid oxidation, and histamine metabolism. Injury-comparison experiments revealed that the observed proteomic changes as a result of limb amputation are different than crush injury, denervation, or tail amputation. This study proposes axolotl P-CSF as a reservoir for limb amputation-associated systemic signaling and as a potential conduit of signals involved in limb regeneration.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.