Back

Targeting Mitochondrial Dysfunction with Mdivi-1 Confers Therapeutic Protection in a Mouse Model of Mustard Keratopathy

Guha Mazumder, A.; Magarychoff, E.; Alemi, H.; Raghav, R.; Chin, M. T.; Wiley, C. D.; Fini, M. E.

2026-08-28 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.08.27.742467 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mustard keratopathy, caused by exposure of the cornea to sulfur or nitrogen mustard vesicants, chemical warfare agents, can lead to severe and often irreversible vision loss. Despite considerable efforts to develop medical countermeasures, including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anti-fibrotic, and anti-angiogenic therapies, no treatment effectively targets the underlying mechanisms responsible for mustard-induced tissue injury or prevents long-term disease progression. In the present study, we comprehensively define mitochondrial mechanisms underlying nitrogen mustard-induced corneal injury in both our cell culture model in vitro and a mouse model in vivo. DNM1L (aka Drp1) is a mitochondria-localized dynamin-related GTPase that executes mitochondrial fission and facilitates the autophagic elimination of damaged mitochondrial components. Using complementary in vitro and in vivo models, we demonstrate that nitrogen mustard rapidly induces excessive mitochondrial fragmentation, bioenergetic collapse, membrane depolarization, oxidative stress, intracellular acidification, mitophagy, and apoptotic cell death. Pharmacological inhibition of DNM1L with Mdivi-1 preserves mitochondrial structure and function, restores cellular metabolism, reduces oxidative damage, and markedly improves corneal epithelial integrity, and tissue repair following nitrogen mustard exposure. Collectively, these findings establish mitochondrial dysfunction as a central pathological mechanism in mustard keratopathy and identify DNM1L-mediated mitochondrial remodeling as a therapeutically actionable target. Our work provides strong preclinical evidence supporting mitochondrial-directed therapy as a promising strategy for treating mustard keratopathy.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.