CHANGE IN STROKE SURVIVAL in Sweden 2000 -- 2022 -- the importance of sex, attained education and age
bolin, k.; Stibrant Sunnerhagen, K.
Show abstract
Background The time trend in long-term survival after a stroke is to some extent unknow due to (relatively) short follow up periods in available data. The objective of this study is to identify and quantify differences in long-term stroke survival in Sweden between men and women and patients with different attained educational levels, comparing two time-periods, 2000-2009 and 2010-2022. Methods This study employs total population Swedish register data pertaining to hospital-based care and mortality due to stroke for the period 2000-2022 in order to estimate survival (all-cause mortality) after ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke, respectively, and pertaining to attained educational level. Kaplan-Meier survival functions are estimated stratifying for time-period, sex and educational level. Cox regressions are employed to quantify mortality hazard ratios between the strata. Age is taken into account in complementary analyses (supplement). Results Taking only time-period (2000-2009 vs 2010-2022) into account resulted in significantly higher survival in the second period for ischaemic stroke patients (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.83-0.84), while no significant difference could be detected for haemorrhagic stroke. Stratifying for sex showed that men gained more than women in terms of reduced mortality hazard rate between the periods. Further stratifying by educational level and estimating survival separately for men and women showed that, for both men and women, patients with the lowest education were relatively worse off (compared to patients with higher education) in the second period. Further analyses, taking age into account, reversed the relative hazard ratio between men and women, but corroborated the result that low education is associated with poorer outcome than high education. Conclusions The results suggest that there are considerable differences in expected long-term survival after stroke between the sexes, but that this may be due to differences in age between the sexes at the time of stroke. Moreover, lower educational level is significantly associated with lower long-time survival.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Claims-Based Machine Learning Classifier of Modified Rankin Scale in Acute Ischemic Stroke 93%
- Influence of socioeconomic status on functional outcomes after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
- Predictors of survival in patients with ischemic stroke and active cancer: A prospective, multicenter, observational study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations between cardiovascular risk factors, stroke severity, and post-stroke cognition: a moderated mediation analysis 92%
- Motivational Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study 92%
- Smoking does not alter treatment effect of intravenous thrombolysis in mild to moderate acute ischemic stroke; a Dutch String-of-Pearls Institute (PSI) Stroke Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The association between major trauma centre care and outcomes of adult patients injured by low falls in England and Wales 90%
- Impact on all-cause mortality of a case prediction and prevention intervention designed to reduce secondary care utilisation: findings from a randomised controlled trial 89%
- Diversity of CPR manikins for basic life support education: Use of manikin sex, race, and body shape – A scoping review 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.