Long-term outcomes of cruciate ligament injury: evidence from New Zealand linked register data
Pryymachenko, Y.; Wilson, R.; Abbott, J. H.
Show abstract
Objectives To analyse the long-term effects of a cruciate ligament (CL) injury on health and socioeconomic outcomes. Methods We used a comprehensive national injury insurance database to identify CL injuries occurring in New Zealand between 2009 and 2022, and employed a doubly robust staggered difference-in-differences research design to identify the effects of these injuries on outcomes up to 10 years after injury. The outcomes of interest were healthcare use (hospitalisations, emergency department visits, medications, knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis), associated healthcare costs, and labour market outcomes (employment rates, income, and government benefit payments). Results We identified 61 344 CL injuries for inclusion in the analysis. Over 10-year follow-up, a CL injury resulted in increased healthcare use (0.6 more hospitalizations [95%CI 0.4 to 0.7], 1.7 more days spent in hospital [95%CI 1.3 to 2.1], 0.4 more emergency department visits [95%CI 0.3 to 0.6], 2.5 more outpatient visits [95%CI 1.8 to 3.2], and 4.7 more medications dispensed [95%CI -1.8 to 11.2]) and public healthcare costs ($7 537; 95%CI 5 888 to 9 186), reduced income (-$6 060; 95%CI -11 644 to -475), and increased benefit payments ($1 152; 95%CI 542 to 1 761). Conclusion CL injuries have long-term impacts on healthcare use and socioeconomic outcomes. Strategies to reduce the incidence of CL injuries have the potential to realise large health and economic benefits.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceived facilitators and barriers among physical therapists and orthopedic surgeons to pre-operative home-based exercise with one exercise-only in patients with severe knee osteoarthritis: A qualitative interview study nested in the QUADX-1 trial 91%
- The prevalence and risk factors for phantom limb pain in people with amputations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 91%
- Effectiveness of early versus delayed rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: systematic review and meta-analyses 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Combined physical and pharmaceutical anabolic osteoporosis therapies synergistically increase bone response and local mechanoregulation 87%
- Methodological Rigor in COVID-19 Clinical Research: A Systematic Review and Case-Control Analysis 85%
- Accelerating functional gene discovery in osteoarthritis 85%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use and appropriateness of Reporting Guidelines in physical therapy research: a protocol for a meta-research study 89%
- Performance of ICD-10-based injury severity scores in pediatric trauma patients using the ICD-AIS map and survival rate ratios 86%
- Prospective Registration of Trials: Where we are, why, and how we could get better 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy and safety of antidepressants for the treatment of low back pain and osteoarthritis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 88%
- Post-discharge Acute Care and Outcomes in the Era of Readmission Reduction: A National Retrospective Cohort Study of Medicare Beneficiaries in the United States 85%
- Risk Of Hospitalisation With COVID-19 Among Teachers Compared To Healthcare Workers And Other Working-Age Adults. A Nationwide Case-Control Study 84%
Similar papers in this journal
- Can prognostic factors for indirect muscle injuries in elite football (soccer) players be identified using data from preseason screening? An exploratory analysis using routinely-collected periodic health examination records 92%
- Comparative Computed Tomography with Stress Manoeuvres for Diagnosing Distal Isolated Tibiofibular Syndesmotic Injury in Acute Ankle Sprain: a Protocol for an Accuracy-Test Prospective Study. 92%
- Clinical And Cost-Effectiveness Of A Personalised Guided Consultation Versus Usual Physiotherapy Care In People Presenting With Shoulder Pain: A Protocol For The Panda-S Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial And Process Evaluation 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.