Molecular landscape and risk stratification in acute myeloid leukemia - insights from the real-world REFORM-AML cohort
Kristensen, D. T.; Broendum, R. F.; Knudsen, M.; Grubach, L.; Marcher, C.; Preiss, B.; Bibi, M. L.; Hoegdall, E.; Poulsen, T.; Skov, V.; Oerskov, A. D.; Groenbaek, K.; Hansen, J. W.; Schoellkopf, C.; Cowland, J.; Andersen, M. K.; Severinsen, M. T.; Vejgaard, C.; Larsen, O. H.; Vang, S.; Boegsted, M.; Roug, A. S.
Show abstract
Large genomically annotated acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) datasets exist, but population-based contemporary cohorts remain scarce. Here we report clinicopathological, genomic, and outcome data from Danish AML patients. 2,512 AML patients were identified between 2015-2022, of whom 33.8% had available NGS data (NGS+). In patients [≤]70 years, baseline characteristics and outcomes were comparable between NGS+ and NGS- groups. In patients >70 years, more NGS+ patients received intensive treatment, but survival was similar among intensively treated patients. The distribution of mutations varied significantly by age and sex, with older age and male sex exhibiting higher frequencies of adverse-risk gene mutations. In intensively treated NGS+ patients, ELN2017 stratified 5-year OS: 58.4% (favorable), 43.4% (intermediate), and 28.2% (adverse), with hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.63 (favorable) and 1.45 (adverse) relative to intermediate. ELN2022 yielded corresponding OS rates of 56.9%, 51.8%, and 29.7%, with HRs of 0.78 and 1.86. The two models had comparable predictive performance for OS in a time-dependent model. In conclusion, outcomes of intensively treated AML patients were comparable irrespective of NGS status, underscoring the representativeness of the REFORM-AML database for the Danish AML population. Age and male sex correlated with adverse-risk mutations, and both ELN2017 and ELN2022 robustly predicted survival.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-cell transcriptomics predicts relapse in MLL-rearranged acute lymphoblastic leukemia in infants 95%
- Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators resensitize FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukemia cells with NRAS mutations to FLT3 inhibitors 95%
- Mapping AML heterogeneity – multi-cohort transcriptomic analysis identifies novel clusters and divergent ex-vivo drug responses 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Serum Flt3 ligand is a biomarker of progenitor cell mass and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia 94%
- Monosomy 7/del(7q) Cause Sensitivity to Inhibitors of Nicotinamide Phosphoribosyltransferase in Acute Myeloid Leukemia 94%
- Single cell long-read genotyping of transcriptomes reveals discrete mechanisms of clonal evolution in post-myeloproliferative neoplasm acute myeloid leukemia. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinicopathologic Correlates and Natural History of Atypical Chronic Myeloid Leukemia 94%
- Mutational and transcriptional landscape of pediatric B-cell precursor lymphoblastic lymphoma 94%
- Inhibitory KIR-Ligand Interactions and Relapse Protection Following HLA Matched Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ex Vivo Drug Responses and Molecular Profiles of 597 Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients 94%
- Differential genomic and transcriptomic events associated with high-grade transformation of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia 94%
- NOTCH1 fusions in pediatric T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma: a high-risk subgroup with CCL17 (TARC) levels as diagnostic biomarker 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characteristics and predictors of hospitalization and death in the first 9,519 cases with a positive RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 in Denmark: A nationwide cohort 85%
- Early prediction of mortality risk among severe COVID-19 patients using machine learning 84%
- Causal relationships between risk of venous thromboembolism and 18 cancers: a bidirectional Mendelian randomisation analysis 84%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.