Back

Validation of individualized flow simulations for determining the pressure gradient in patients with renal artery stenosis

Bouwmeester, T. A.; Collard, D.; Zijlstra, I. A. J.; van Hulst, E.; Lamers, A. G. B. H.; Vogt, L.; van den Born, B.-J. H.; van de Velde, L.

2026-08-31 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.08.27.26361537 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objectives To validate two computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models derived from computed tomography angiography (CTA) for estimating trans-stenotic pressure gradients, using invasive intra-arterial pressure measurements as the reference standard in patients with renal artery stenosis (RAS). Background We assessed whether non-invasive assessment of the pressure gradient using CFD could be a reliable alternative to intra-arterial measurements for identifying hemodynamically significant RAS. Methods We performed intra-arterial measurements at rest and during dopamine-induced hyperemia to assess the trans-stenotic pressure gradient in 28 patients with RAS. A pre-intervention CTA scan was used to simulate the pressure gradient with a CFD model using a strategy based on Murray's law (CFD-Mu) and cortical volume (CFD-C). The agreement between the simulated and measured pressure gradients was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis and diagnostic agreement on the presence of a hemodynamically significant stenosis. Results In 20 patients, successful measurements and simulations were obtained. The ICC between measured pressure gradient and the CFD pressure gradient was 0.78 and 0.94 during baseline and 0.86 and 0.72 during hyperemia, for CFD-Mu and CFD-C, respectively. The sensitivity of CFD-Mu and CFD-C was 70% for both models at rest and 100% compared to the hyperemic measurements, whereas the specificity was 90% and 70% at rest and 79% and 72% during hyperemia, respectively. Conclusions The results support the use of individualized CFD simulations for hemodynamic assessment of RAS using CTA as input. The CFD models demonstrated high accuracy for the identification of a hemodynamically significant stenosis.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.