Back

Colonization of the gut microbiota with Akkermansia muciniphila ameliorates dysbiosis-mediated transplant arterial injury in female mice

Dumlao, J. M.; Rey, K.; McCallum, P.; Wheatley, E.; Enns, W.; Hodak, C. R.; Davey, L. E.; Choy, J. C.

2026-08-31 immunology
10.64898/2026.08.26.747435 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Transplant arterial injury is an underlying feature of acute organ transplant rejection and is a main cause of late heart transplant failure. The role of the gut microbiota, and especially specific microbial components of this community, in controlling immune responses that cause this aspect of rejection is poorly understood. Methods: We utilized a murine aortic interposition model of transplant arterial injury to investigate the role of the gut commensal bacteria, Akkermansia muciniphila, in controlling immune responses in transplant arteries. Results: Early life treatment of female mice with broad spectrum antibiotics, which delayed colonization of the intestinal tract with bacteria until after weaning, led to the development of dysbiosis in adults that was characterized by the absence of A. muciniphila. This was related to an elevation in systemic levels of CCL2 and a reduction in the immunomodulatory short-chain fatty acid, propionate. When transplant arterial injury was examined, there was more arterial injury indicative of acute rejection and increased intimal thickening reflective of transplant arteriosclerosis in grafts from dysbiotic mice compared to controls. Dysbiosis also increased macrophage accumulation early after transplantation in dysbiotic mice. Notably, restoring A. muciniphila in the gut microbiota of dysbiotic mice through voluntary oral administration in infants ameliorated macrophage-mediated transplant arterial injury. Conclusions: A. muciniphila is an immunomodulatory component of the gut microbiota that protects against vascular injury and pathology in organ transplantation.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.