Back

LNP-mediated BCL11A Editing Corrects Sickling Phenotypes and Preserves HSPC Fitness Compared to Electroporation

Ansong-Ansongton, Y.; Adanho, C. S. A.; Lawanprasert, A.; Vysotskiy, M.; Tang, Y.; Kleinhez, A. L.; Wilson, R.; Rivers, A.; Nguyen, D. N.

2026-08-27 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.08.26.747413 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Hemoglobinopathies, including sickle cell disease (SCD) and thalassemia syndromes, affect millions of individuals worldwide who have limited access to curative therapies. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant following ex vivo CRISPR editing of the BCL11A erythroid enhancer reactivates fetal hemoglobin (HbF) and achieves an effective cure, but the resource constraints of clinically approved procedures for editing by electroporation (EP) severely limit widespread implementation. We directly compared the functional outcomes of EP delivery of Cas9 ribonucleoprotein with lipid nanoparticle (LNP) delivery of Cas9 mRNA in primary human HSPCs obtained from healthy HbAA donors and from patients with SCD. While higher editing rates are achieved with EP, LNP-treated HSPCs exhibited greater viability and cell yields that persisted throughout a multi-stage in vitro erythroid differentiation protocol. By day 20, the yield of mature red blood cells (CD71lowCD235ahigh) was lowest in the EP cohorts. Across treatment groups, we observed HbF induction proportional to indel frequency. LNP editing of SCD patient-derived HSPCs as low as 25% modified alleles still caused HbF production and reduced the propensity for sickling of in vitro differentiated RBCs. These findings highlight the critical trade-offs among manufacturing ease, delivery-associated toxicity, and functional performance across two modalities of therapeutic genome editing for hemoglobinopathies.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.