Back

Can an original be found? Mitochondrial species identity does not predict nuclear genome similarity in the photosymbiotic jellyfish Cassiopea andromeda and C. xamachana

Muffett, K. M.; Sporre, M.; Mammone, M.; Miglietta, M. P.

2026-08-27 ecology
10.64898/2026.08.26.747389 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The Upside-Down Jellyfish, Cassiopea, has become a mainstay of cnidarian photosymbiosis research. Two nominal sister species, C. xamachana and the globally introduced C. andromeda, supply most of the medusae used in American and European laboratory research within this genus. As founder identity can shape experimental outcomes, here we utilize whole genome resequencing of 21 Cassiopea medusae spanning the Florida Keys, Bocas del Toro (Panama), and a European laboratory line, to ask whether mitochondrial species assignment predicts nuclear genome identity. Across multiple population structure analyses using the nuclear genome, Floridian Cassiopea carrying C. xamachana or C. andromeda mitotypes are indistinguishable, and geography is the dominant axis of nuclear genetic structure. A population tree that groups the two Floridian mitotypes as a single interbreeding unit is strongly supported (Patterson's D {approx} 0.0, Z = 0.02), whereas a tree that respects mitochondrial species boundaries is rejected (D = 0.42, Z = 20.8). Strikingly, the European "true" C. andromeda line clusters with Panamanian C. xamachana rather than with Floridian C. andromeda-mitotype animals. From the same sequencing effort, we recover evidence of symbiont community variability (Cladocopium) in Panama and assemble two near-complete Tenacibaculum and Endozoicomonas metagenomically-assembled genomes from Floridian host tissue. Together these results indicate that the C. andromeda/C. xamachana hybridization zone may extend across ocean basins, and that a "pure" original of either species may be difficult to find. We urge Cassiopea researchers to establish new European laboratory lines with described genomes.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.