Back

GLABRA2 regulates gene expression via its own EAR-motif mediated recruitment of the TPL/TPR corepressors

Ahmad, B.; Ulutas, A.; Bailey, A. K.; Marberg, L. R.; Schrick, K.

2026-08-27 plant biology
10.64898/2026.08.26.747311 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The Arabidopsis HD-Zip IV transcription factor GLABRA2 (GL2) displays dual regulatory capabilities, as an activator and repressor of genes that mediate cell-type differentiation of the epidermis. GL2 binds L1 box elements in the promoters of its target genes; however, the mechanisms by which it controls gene expression remain elusive. GL2 contains two putative ethylene-responsive element-binding factor-associated amphiphilic repression (EAR) motifs proximal to its N- and C-termini. The N-terminal EAR motif is highly conserved among GL2 orthologs that form a distinct clade of HD-Zip IV transcription factors in monocots and dicots. We demonstrate that deletion or Ala substitution of this N-terminal EAR motif results in a partial loss-of-function phenotypes in trichomes, non-hair root cells, and seed coat mucilage. In contrast, mutations affecting the C-terminal EAR motif display improper nuclear localization, likely due to protein misfolding. Yeast two-hybrid and in planta co-immunoprecipitation assays show that GL2 selectively interacts with the TOPLESS (TPL) and TPL-RELATED (TPR) corepressors via its N-terminal EAR motif. Fusion of the SUPERMAN REPRESSIVE DOMAIN X (SRDX) with the gl2 N-terminal EAR motif mutant (gl2EAR-N) rescues the epidermal defects of gl2 mutants. Transcriptome analysis of mutant and wild-type seedling roots further confirms the role of the GL2 N-terminal EAR motif in tuning gene expression. Our findings support a model whereby GL2 recruits TPL/TPR corepressors via its EAR motif to sequester histone-modifying proteins, resulting in chromatin remodeling required for epidermal development.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.