Back

Caenorhabditis elegans as a Model to Dissect Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Relationships of Gabapentinoids

Sultana, J.; Castano, J. D.; del Castillo, J. R. E.; Beaudry, F.

2026-08-31 pharmacology and toxicology
10.64898/2026.08.26.747285 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Gabapentin (GBP) and pregabalin (PGB) are widely used gabapentinoids. Previously, we have demonstrated, for the first time, that GBP and PGB modulate the nociceptive response to noxious heat in C. elegans at an optimal concentration. In the current study, we use C. elegans and paired thermal nociception assays with direct internal drug concentration measurements to characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) relationship of both compounds. Neither drug altered baseline mobility or quadrant preference, confirming that behavioral effects reflected genuine antinociceptive action. Both GBP and PGB produced dose- and time-dependent reductions in thermal avoidance, with 500 uM exposures generating a biphasic, V-shaped time course in which suppression of thermal sensitivity deepened before partially reversing. This partial reversal occurred later with PGB than with GBP. Internal concentrations confirmed dose-dependent absorption and retention for both drugs, yet at 500 uM, internal drug levels remained elevated through 360 min even as behavioral avoidance recovered, indicating that the recovery limb reflects active counter-regulation rather than passive clearance, consistent with previously reported transcriptional and proteomic signatures. Exposure-response profiles were notably flat, suggesting a saturable pharmacodynamic ceiling. Molecular modeling revealed conserved electronic pharmacophores supporting shared alpha-2-delta engagement, alongside shape-descriptor differences that may contribute to divergent absorption kinetics. These findings position C. elegans as a valuable model for dissecting gabapentinoid PK/PD relationships. Beyond mechanistic insight, these findings support the continued investigation of C. elegans as a screening platform whose validation could help address the 3R (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement) principles guiding animal research.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.