Back

A root pathogen drives rhizosphere enrichment of antagonistic Pseudomonas and induces production of an antimicrobial metabolite

Zouaoui, M.; Solau, M.; Amiel, A.; Penrose, A.; Belleville, J.; Bazerque, Q.; Fournier, S.; Perez, A.; Camborde, L.; Gaulin, E.; Rey, T.; Dumas, B.

2026-08-27 plant biology
10.64898/2026.08.26.747274 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In plants, the development of soil-borne diseases has been shown to trigger the recruitment of beneficial microbes, which contribute to defense against pathogens. However, the underlying mechanisms driving this recruitment remain elusive. Here, we used a gnotobiotic system combined with a synthetic bacterial community (SynCom) derived from the Medicago truncatula rhizosphere to dissect microbiota pathogen interaction and its role in the development of root rot caused by Aphanomyces euteiches, a devastating soilborne oomycete pathogen of legumes. Through integrated metabarcoding, metabolomics and transcriptomics, we reveal that pathogen infection restructures the bacterial SynCom, selectively enriching the microbial community with specific Pseudomonas spp. strains displaying anti A. euteiches activity. This shift alleviates root rot symptoms, triggers the biosynthesis of the antibiotic 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol (DAPG), a Pseudomonas specialized metabolite inhibiting A. euteiches growth, and amplifies the plant endogenous isoflavonoid defense responses. Unexpectedly, we found that A. euteiches directly activates DAPG production in beneficial bacteria independently of the plant, through the production of a heat-stable, high-molecular-weight (30 - 100 kDa) extracellular components. These findings uncover a novel mechanism whereby a pathogen inadvertently activates antibiotic production in beneficial bacteria, extending the plant immune system. Our research underscores the critical role of microbial interactions in the rhizosphere in determining root disease outcomes, paving the way for microbiome-based strategies to combat root diseases.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.