Back

Higher rewards lead to more accurate flower detection and increased contrast sensitivity in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris

Robert, T.; Flett, E.; Le Lay, H.; Nicolas, M.; Nityananda, V.

2026-08-31 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.08.26.747241 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In vertebrates, top-down visual attention is a cognitive process where internal goals modulate the tuning of peripheral sensory systems. This leads to increased perceived contrast to both goal-relevant objects and areas of the visual field that are attended. Such a system would also be beneficial to bees, enabling them to detect and recognise the most profitable flowers in their environment. We tested whether bumblebees possess a top-down attentional system resembling that seen in vertebrates. We trained two groups of bees to collect rewards under high contrast targets. To potentially induce a difference in attention while searching for the targets, one group received a higher concentration of sucrose rewards compared to the other. During tests, the targets were presented with a series of lower contrasts to measure the contrast sensitivity curves of the bees induced by the different learnt reward levels. We predicted a stronger effect of any attention-like process on contrast sensitivity in the high reward group. We also repeated this experiment with the neonicotinoid pesticide imidacloprid dissolved in the sucrose rewards to test whether this affects bee attention. Across all test contrasts, higher rewards significantly increased bee accuracy when locating targets, lowered contrast thresholds and reduced the latency to make first choices. Imidacloprid reduced bee accuracy but did not influence first choice latency. These results suggest that learnt floral rewards can influence bee behavioural contrast sensitivity in a manner resembling vertebrate top-down attention and that imidacloprid may modulate this through effects on their nervous system.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.