TSPAN3 defines a distinct intracellular trafficking route to secretory multivesicular bodies
Van den Bor, J.; Bobeldijk, M. L.; Zala, C. A.; Sanchez, C. T.; Lalo, C.; Adem, B.; Maaijen, J. A.; Bundock, E. M.; Weijers, N. A.; Soltani, Z. E.; de Heus, C.; Jansen, P. W.; Zheng, W.; Andaloussi, S. E.; Liv, N.; van Spriel, A.; Stecker, K. E.; Smal, I. V.; van Mierlo, G.; Verweij, F. J.
Show abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) comprise molecularly diverse populations generated through multiple membrane-trafficking pathways, yet the intracellular basis of this heterogeneity remains poorly understood. Here, we identify the EV-associated tetraspanin TSPAN3 as a marker of a secretory multivesicular body (MVB) population that is molecularly and functionally distinct from canonical CD63-positive compartments. Using endogenous genome editing, live-cell and super-resolution microscopy, electron microscopy, quantitative EV secretion assays, and complementary proteomic approaches, we show that TSPAN3 localizes to fusion-competent MVBs but exhibits limited overlap with CD63 during secretion. Unlike CD63, which extensively traffics through the plasma membrane and depends on YXX{Phi}-mediated endocytic retrieval, TSPAN3 reaches secretory MVBs predominantly through an intracellular trafficking route that relies on a dileucine-containing sorting region. Orthogonal proximity-labeling and affinity-purification proteomics revealed that TSPAN3-positive compartments are associated with a selective LC3/ATG8-related membrane network, including GABARAPL2 and proteins involved in endosomal membrane remodeling and fusion. Perturbation of residues required for this association impaired localization to LC3-positive compartments and reduced secretory MVB fusion. Consistent with these findings, pharmacological disruption of autophagy- and endolysosomal-associated pathways differentially altered TSPAN3-positive EV secretion. Finally, proximity-labeled EV proteomics demonstrated that TSPAN3-associated EVs possess cargo signatures distinct from CD63-associated EVs, with greater representation of endosomal and endolysosomal proteins suggesting that tetraspanin-associated membrane nanodomains retain molecular signatures consistent with their intracellular trafficking history. Together, our findings identify TSPAN3 as a marker of a previously unrecognized secretory MVB population distinguished by its intracellular trafficking, molecular interactions, and EV composition, supporting a model in which distinct tetraspanin-organized membrane nanodomains are associated with different intracellular trafficking routes and molecularly distinct EV populations.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Loss of ErbB3 redirects Integrin β1 from early endosomal recycling to secretion in extracellular vesicles 93%
- SHIP164 is a Chorein Motif Containing Lipid Transport Protein that Controls Membrane Dynamics and Traffic at the Endosome-Golgi Interface. 93%
- Autophagy cargo receptors are secreted via extracellular vesicles and particles in response to endolysosomal inhibition or impaired autophagosome maturation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- CD133 shapes extracellular vesicle cargo and angiogenic function in basal-like triple-negative breast cancer 93%
- Systemic Inflammation Modulates Clearance and drives Extra-Hepatic Distribution of Extracellular Vesicles 92%
- Microglial Extracellular Vesicles Mediate C1Q Deposition At The Pre-Synapse And Promote Synaptic Pruning 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Neuronal extracellular vesicles regulate axon development in primary cortical neurons via local miR-99a targeting of HS3ST2 92%
- The yeast Art1 arrestin domain contains disordered insertions that regulate its localization and activity 92%
- PACSIN2-dependent apical endocytosis regulates the morphology of epithelial microvilli 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.