Back

Antifungal Resistance and Adhesin-Mediated Phenotypic Plasticity Among Genomically Diverse Candida auris Clinical Isolates

Wang, T.; Ma, T.; Zhou, C.; Gonzalez Martinez, R.; Putnam, N. E.; Johnson, J. K.; Jabra-Rizk, M. A.

2026-08-31 microbiology
10.64898/2026.08.26.747207 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Candida auris (currently Candidozyma auris) is an emerging fungal pathogen responsible for dramatic global increase in invasive candidiasis with high mortality. Most concerning, C. auris has a high propensity to colonize patients and persist and develop multidrug resistance to main classes of antifungals. In this study, we investigated the genetic and phenotypic diversity and resistance mechanisms of C. auris clinical isolates recovered from hospitalized infected patients. A total of 53 isolates from 38 unique patients were recovered from various clinical sources and evaluated for susceptibility to routine antifungal drugs. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis were performed to generate a phylogenetic network to infer population structure and identify mutations associated with drug resistance development. Isolates were also phenotypically evaluated for ability to form biofilms and aggregate, and cell wall adhesins gene expression studies were performed to provide mechanistic insights into C. auris phenotypic plasticity. Except for one clade III isolate, all isolates belonged to clade I and all were resistant to fluconazole with incidence of resistance to amphotericin B, echinocandins or both. Non-synonymous SNPs were found in genes associated with antifungal resistance including ERG11, TAC1B, CDR1 and FKS1. Phenotypically, isolates varied in their ability to form biofilm and aggregate which correlated with expression of the Scf1 and Als4112 cell wall adhesins genes highlighting C. auris phenotypic plasticity in circulating clinical strains. These findings underscore the growing clinical threat posed by C. auris and reinforce the need for optimized surveillance and treatment strategies for controlling its spread.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.