Back

Sport expertise and motor imagery abilities shape sensorimotor rhythm modulations during visualisation tasks: Implications for neurofeedback-based cognitive training in athletes

Izac, M.; Pierrieau, E.; Rossignol, E.; Grechukhin, N.; Coudroy, E.; Pillette, L.; N'Kaoua, B.; Jeunet-Kelway, C.

2026-09-01 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.08.26.747187 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Kinaesthetic motor imagery (kMI) is widely used in sport to enhance motor performance by engaging cortical sensorimotor networks. Neurofeedback may further support kMI, but the optimal neural target to reinforce remains unclear. Maximal sensorimotor event-related desynchronisation (SMR-ERD) represents a relevant target as it may index sensorimotor cortex engagement, yet sport expertise has been associated with reduced SMR-ERD, potentially reflecting neural efficiency. The optimal neurofeedback target may therefore depend on sport expertise, movement expertise, and individual kMI ability. This study examined how these factors influence sensorimotor activity during kMI. We compared 17 basketball players (Experts) and 16 individuals without formal basketball training (Novices). kMI ability and frequency of use were assessed using questionnaires, while SMR-ERD was quantified using electroencephalography (EEG) during kMI. Participants imagined either a basketball-specific movement (Free throw), for which only Experts had extensive experience, or a generic movement (Box lifting), familiar to both groups. Experts reported greater kMI ability and more frequent kMI use than Novices. Only Experts exhibited significant and sustained SMR-ERD during kMI. Moreover, SMR-ERD was stronger in Experts than Novices specifically during Free throw kMI, corresponding to their movement of expertise. Nonetheless, within the Expert group, higher kMI ability was associated with reduced SMR-ERD. These findings suggest that sport expertise initially enhances voluntary recruitment of sensorimotor networks during kMI, whereas greater kMI ability may subsequently promote neural efficiency, resulting in reduced overall sensorimotor cortical activation. These results highlight the need to tailor kMI-based neurofeedback training to users' sport expertise and kMI ability levels.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.