How to pour a cup of coffee
Midlagajni, N.; Fleming, R. W.; Rothkopf, C. A.
Show abstract
Pouring a drink feels deceptively trivial, yet it requires guiding a boundary-free fluid into a vessel without spilling, overflowing, or toppling it -- a task at which robots remain notoriously brittle. How humans achieve this so effortlessly is unknown, as motor control has predominantly been studied in brief, highly constrained laboratory tasks, leaving the control principles underlying ecological tasks largely unknown. Here we measured continuous sensorimotor control during liquid pouring across various containers, vessels, and speed demands. Despite substantial variation in movement trajectories and durations, individuals maintained a strikingly invariant preferred fill level. Counterintuitively, fill level variability decreased at higher fill levels, and precision was maintained even under time pressure. A stochastic optimal control model combining a data-driven nonlinear approximation of flow dynamics with a cost that balanced individualised fill level, energy expenditure and flow-rate reproduced the behaviour. Humans thus pour optimally, given their sensorimotor limits and idiosyncratic notion of "full".
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Human confidence judgments reflect reliability-based hierarchical integration of contextual information 95%
- Exploration-based learning of a stabilizing controller predicts locomotor adaptation 94%
- A distributed and efficient population code of mixed selectivity neurons for flexible navigation decisions 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.