Back

Rare and Common Germline and Somatic Variants Shape Immune Cytopenia Risk and Enable Risk Stratification

Faria, S. D. S.; Bineau, J.; Moisan, R.; Legault, M.-A.; Lecluze, E.; Pincez, T.

2026-08-31 hematology
10.64898/2026.08.26.26361484 medRxiv
Show abstract

The genetic risk factors of immune cytopenias are unclear. Immune cytopenias have been reported in various genetic contexts: 1) inherited error of immunity genes, mainly due to rare germline variants, 2) systemic lupus erythematosus, associated with common germline variants, 3) hematological malignancies, and 4) clonal hematopoiesis, the latter two due to somatic variants. However, the respective contribution and interaction of these variants remain to be investigated. Here, we used two large biobanks with whole genome sequencing data to systematically investigate the genetic contribution to immune cytopenia. We found that the four types of genetic variants independently contribute to immune cytopenia risk. We notably found that carriers of variants in some autosomal recessive genes of inherited error of immunity had an increased risk of immune cytopenia. Additionally, common variant-mediated risk of systemic lupus erythematosus also increased the risk of immune cytopenia. Overall, a third to a half of patients with immune cytopenia carried at least one of the four genetic risk variants investigated. Combining the four variants allowed stratifying the risk of immune cytopenia in both general and high-risk population. In general population, the 10-year incidence of immune cytopenia in the lowest and highest risk groups was 0.08% and 1.5%, respectively. In sum, this work identified that different genetic risk factors can lead to immune cytopenia. A large proportion of individuals with immune cytopenia carried an underlying genetic risk factor. Finally, combining these genetic risk factors enabled risk stratification.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.