Nanoscale Core-Rim Compartmentalization of Histamine and GABA within Individual Synaptic Vesicles
Fujiwara, K.
Show abstract
Classical synaptic transmission assumes that amino acid neurotransmitters and monoamines are stored in distinct vesicle populations. Here, we provide structural evidence for a dual-transmitter organization in which histamine and GABA are spatially partitioned into a core and rim within individual synaptic vesicles. Using an engineered glutaraldehyde-NaBH4; immuno-electron microscopy platform, quantitative analysis of 2,195 vesicles revealed a previously unrecognized nanoscale architecture, with histamine-associated signal concentrated within the vesicular core (95.1%), while GABA is organized toward the peripheral rim. Light microscopy further demonstrated extensive histamine-GABA correspondence across central and peripheral tissues, including sympathetic ganglia and adrenal medulla. This intravesicular segregation challenges the conventional separation of amino acid and monoamine storage into distinct vesicle classes and reveals that chemically distinct transmitters can occupy organized domains within a single vesicular lumen. This architecture may provide a structural basis for the distinct physiological modes of GABAergic and histaminergic signaling, linking nanoscale vesicular organization to their established differences in temporal action.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Structural Basis for the Clamping and Ca2+ Activation of SNARE-mediated Fusion by Synaptotagmin 96%
- Cryo-EM Structures of Higher Order Gephyrin OligomersReveal Principles of Inhibitory Postsynaptic Scaffold Organization 96%
- Modular actin nano-architecture enables podosome protrusion and mechanosensing 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.