Back

Dynamic inositol pyrophosphate synthesis is a targetable therapeutic opportunity in ovarian cancer.

Bondeson, D. P.; Husselbee, D.; Hanbury, S.; Cameron, A.; Mesa, G.; Chadeganipour, A.; Sawant, J. Y.; Bhattacharya, T.; Langan, C.; Swanson, E. M.; Srinivasan, K.; Liu, Y.; Siala, H.; Kocak, M.; Dumont, N.; Burton, R.; Ip, B. C.; Doench, J. G.; Roth, J. A.; Gould, A. E.; Root, D. E.; Proctor, D.; Golub, T. R.

2026-08-26 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.08.25.747159 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We previously reported that the phosphate exporter XPR1 is required to prevent toxic phosphate accumulation in ovarian cancer cells. To guide therapeutic development, we sought to systematically compare potential strategies to inhibit XPR1: directly targeting the phosphate efflux channel, targeting its partner protein KIDINS220, or inhibiting the synthesis of inositol pyrophosphates (PP-InsPs), metabolites which activate XPR1. We evaluated functional domains in XPR1 and KIDINS220 using mutational scanning and found that loss of function mutations in XPR1 clustered in distinct regions throughout the protein, with the most deleterious mutations in the PP-InsP-binding domain. In contrast, loss of function mutations in KIDINS220 were infrequent and altered the localization of XPR1, consistent with a scaffolding role for KIDINS220. These data highlight the functional relevance of PP-InsPs, which we confirmed by inhibiting their synthesis using IP6K inhibitors. We demonstrate that IP6K inhibition phenocopies XPR1 inhibition across hundreds of cancer cell lines, with the mechanism of sensitivity solely due to inhibition of cellular phosphate efflux. Finally, we show that IP6K inhibitors decrease tumor burden in xenograft models of ovarian cancer, but that the rapid resynthesis of PP-InsPs requires high exposures to achieve efficacy. This study comprehensively evaluates the XPR1-dependent phosphate efflux network and reinforces the concept of directly targeting XPR1 as a precision medicine strategy to benefit patients with ovarian cancer.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.